OpenAI and Google DeepMind both claim gold at the International Math Olympiad 2025, igniting a fresh debate on AI’s rapid reasoning leap and who truly leads the AI race.
🖋 By Meenakshi – AZAD Architects, Barnala
OpenAI vs Google DeepMind:
AI Models Share IMO Gold
The 2025 International Math Olympiad (IMO), one of the most prestigious high school-level math challenges, became an unexpected battleground for AI supremacy. OpenAI and Google DeepMind’s cutting-edge models both achieved gold-medal scores, surpassing most human competitors. But beyond the celebratory headlines lies a story of rivalry, skepticism, and a fierce race to shape the future of AI reasoning.
The Unexpected AI Showdown at IMO 2025
Traditionally a proving ground for the world’s sharpest young minds, IMO 2025 turned into a test of AI’s growing problem-solving abilities. Both OpenAI and Google DeepMind submitted informal reasoning models capable of reading natural language questions and generating proof-like answers, a step ahead of last year’s machine-readable approaches.
From Silver to Gold: How AI Systems Evolved
Last year, Google DeepMind’s AI only earned a silver medal, limited by its need for human-translated problem formats. But this year, both companies made a leap—building systems that could handle the math problems directly in natural language, scoring five out of six questions correctly, outperforming most high school participants.
The Subtle Rivalry Beyond the Numbers
While the gold medals signaled progress, they also fueled a quiet feud. Google accused OpenAI of announcing results prematurely, before IMO officially graded the tests. Google waited for official validation to respect the students, while OpenAI claimed third-party IMO medalists had already verified its model’s performance.
Why This Benchmark Matters for AI Research
IMO is not just a math contest; it is symbolic. Many AI researchers hail from competitive math backgrounds, and winning here signals true reasoning breakthroughs beyond simple coding or arithmetic. Yet, both companies admit that while AI can tackle structured problems, it still struggles with ambiguous, real-world tasks.
Official Validation vs Perception Wars
Google emphasized it worked closely with IMO organizers and followed their grading standards, while OpenAI pursued an independent evaluation. Both paths led to gold, but the differing approaches highlight a bigger AI industry narrative—validation versus hype.
The Bigger Picture: AI’s Rapid Leap Forward
Regardless of the debate, one fact remains—AI reasoning models are advancing fast. Only a small fraction of the world’s brightest students matched the scores of these AI systems, signaling how close machines are getting to human-level mathematical reasoning.
What is Next in the AI Race?
With OpenAI expected to release GPT-5 soon and Google DeepMind refining its own reasoning models, the competition is far from over. Both companies now stand shoulder-to-shoulder in the public eye, each trying to prove it still holds the edge in the AI reasoning revolution.
Closing Thought:
The IMO golds may have sparked a minor controversy, but they also mark a major milestone. AI models are not just solving math problems—they are reshaping what we define as human-level reasoning. The real question is no longer if machines can match us, but how soon they will surpass us.
📌 Thank you!
Follow Finance (AZAD Architects, Barnala) for practical tips from an architect, blogger, technical expert, and financer's lens.
Finance (Azad Architects, Barnala)
